Our Latest Blogs

Your brand is your most important asset. Dive into Indie Law’s resources to guide you through the maze of trademark law and keep your brand safe from copycats and infringers!

How to Protect Your Brand Before You Launch It

Most entrepreneurs do not lose their brand because of competition. They lose it because they did not protect it early enough.

It happens more often than people think. A founder picks a name, builds a logo, launches a website, and starts getting traction. Then a legal issue shows up. The name is already taken or too similar to an existing trademark. Now everything has to change.

Rebranding is not just frustrating. It is expensive. It can cost thousands of dollars in design, lost traffic, and momentum. In some cases, it can stop a business completely.

At the same time, the United States sees hundreds of thousands of trademark applications filed every year. That means the chances of name conflicts are only increasing. On the other side, more than 90 percent of startups fail, often because they struggle with positioning, visibility, or strategy.

So founders are dealing with two risks at once. They need to protect their brand legally, and they need to launch it in a way that actually generates revenue.

Most people handle these as separate problems. That is where things break down.

A typical path looks like this. You hire a trademark attorney to file paperwork. Then later, you try to figure out branding, messaging, and how to launch. There is no connection between the two steps. No clear system. Just a lot of guesswork.

The problem is that these decisions are not separate. They affect each other from the beginning. A brand name is not just a legal asset. It is also a marketing asset. If it is not viable on both sides, the entire business is at risk.

That is why Indie Law and 52Launch work together.

This is not just a partnership. It is a more complete way to build a brand. Instead of treating legal protection and launch strategy as two disconnected steps, this approach connects them from day one.

Indie Law focuses on protecting your brand the right way before you invest in it. That means confirming your name is actually available, filing your trademark correctly, and helping you avoid costly legal problems later. This step creates a solid foundation so you are not building on something that could collapse.

From there, 52Launch helps you turn that protected brand into something real in the market. That includes positioning, messaging, and a clear go to market strategy. Instead of guessing what might work, you move forward with a plan designed to attract attention and drive revenue.

Think about the difference in outcomes.

One founder skips the legal step or rushes through it. They invest in branding and launch quickly. A few months later, they run into a conflict and have to start over. Time is lost. Money is wasted. Momentum disappears.

Another founder takes a different path. They validate and protect their brand first. Then they build and launch with a clear strategy behind it. Every step supports the next. There is less risk and more direction.

The second path is not just safer. It is more efficient.

This is what makes the Indie Law and 52Launch approach different. It is not about filing a trademark or launching a brand in isolation. It is about creating a system that connects protection directly to growth.

Too many entrepreneurs treat trademarks like a simple task to check off a list. In reality, your trademark is the foundation of your brand. If that foundation is weak, everything built on top of it is at risk.

At the same time, a protected brand that never reaches the right audience does not create value. You need both sides working together.

If you are planning to launch a brand, the timing matters. The decisions you make early on will either protect your progress or create problems later.

The smarter move is to handle both from the start. Protect your brand before you invest heavily in it, and build a launch strategy that gives it a real chance to succeed.

If you want to avoid costly mistakes and move forward with clarity, this is where to begin.

Work with Indie Law to secure your trademark the right way. Then partner with 52Launch to bring your brand to market with a clear strategy.

Start here:https://52launch.com/trusted-chicago-trademark-attorney-52launch

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

When Can I Start Using the TM or ® Symbols?

We get this question constantly. And the answer is simpler than most people expect, but the consequences of getting it wrong are worse than most people realize.

Short version: you can start using TM right now. The ® symbol? You have to earn that one.


TM: No Permission Required

The TM symbol isn’t regulated by anyone. There’s no form, no application, no fee. You place it next to your brand name, logo, or slogan, and you’re done. That’s it.

All it does is signal to the world that you’re claiming this as your trademark. Think of it as planting a flag. It doesn’t give you federal protection. It doesn’t mean your mark is registered. But it tells competitors you consider this mark yours, and sometimes that alone is enough to keep someone from copying you.

If you’re offering services, you’ll sometimes see SM (service mark) used instead. Either way, no approval needed.


®: Only After Registration

Different story. The ® symbol means your trademark has been officially registered with the USPTO. Using it before that happens isn’t just premature. It’s potentially illegal.

Federal law prohibits the use of ® on marks that aren’t registered. If you use it on an unregistered mark and that fact comes up in a dispute, it can be used against you. Courts have denied damages to trademark owners who falsely used ®, treating it as fraud on the public.

Not a technicality. A real risk.


Pending Application? Still Use TM.

This is where people trip up. A pending application does not give you the right to use ®. Your application could sit with the USPTO for 8 to 14 months, sometimes longer. During that entire window, you should be using TM.

Only switch to ® after the USPTO issues your official registration certificate. Not when you file. Not when you pass examination. Not when your mark gets published in the Official Gazette. After registration.


Placement

Superscript, upper-right corner of the mark. You don’t need to include it every single time the mark appears. First mention or most prominent placement is standard.

Your website, social media profiles, packaging, and marketing materials are the places that matter most. Be consistent.


The Mistake We Keep Seeing

Business owners slap ® on their brand the moment they file, thinking the application itself gives them the right. It doesn’t. And if someone challenges your mark later, premature ® usage can weaken your position or get your claims thrown out.

We’ve had clients come to us mid-dispute where the other side pointed to the premature ® as evidence of bad faith. Completely avoidable.

Use TM freely. Use ® only after registration. No gray area. If you’re unsure where your application stands, a trademark attorney can answer that in five minutes, before it becomes a problem that takes months to unwind.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

What If I Decide to Not Apply After Seeing My Search Report?

What If I Decide to Not Apply After Seeing My Search Report?

It happens more often than you’d think. You order a trademark search, you’re excited about the name, and then the results come back showing someone else is already using something similar. Or worse, they’ve registered it.

Nobody wants that news. But it’s exactly the kind of news you need before you pour thousands into branding, packaging, and marketing around a name you might not be able to protect.


A Search Report Isn’t a Rejection

A trademark search is not a denial from the USPTO. It’s an analysis of what’s already out there: registered trademarks, pending applications, common law uses, sometimes domain names and business filings.

The purpose is to surface potential conflicts before you file. Risk assessment, not verdict.

Sometimes the conflicts are obvious and filing would be a waste. Other times the results are more nuanced. Maybe the existing mark is in a completely different industry. Maybe it’s been abandoned. Maybe the overlap is minor enough to argue around. That’s where having an attorney review the results matters, because the raw data doesn’t tell the whole story.


When Walking Away Is the Right Call

If the search turns up a registered mark that’s identical or very close to yours, in the same or a related industry, and it’s actively being used? Walking away is usually the smart move.

This is the search doing its job.

Think about the alternative. You file anyway, pay the government fees, wait 8 to 12 months, and then get an office action citing the exact conflict you could have caught early. Or you build a whole brand around the name, get traction, and then a cease and desist letter shows up.

A search costs a fraction of what a rebrand costs.


What Happens to the Money You Already Spent

At Indie Law, the search is a separate step from the application. If you decide not to move forward after reviewing your results, you haven’t burned your application fees, because you haven’t filed one.

You spent money on intelligence. That’s a good investment even when the intelligence tells you to pivot.


What to Do Next

If the search rules out your first choice, you’ve got options. Sometimes a small tweak to the name, adding a word, changing the phrasing, can create enough distance from the existing mark. Your attorney can tell you whether a modification is likely to clear.

If the conflict is too close, it may be time to go back to the drawing board. Frustrating, yes. But infinitely better than building on a name someone else owns.

And once you have a new direction, run another search before filing. Don’t skip it because you’re eager.

Deciding not to file isn’t a setback. It’s a smart business decision. You paid for clarity and you got it. The worst move is ignoring a problematic result and filing anyway, hoping it works out. Hope is not a trademark strategy.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

What If I Live Outside the United States?

If you’re running a business that sells to US customers, or plans to, you can absolutely register a trademark with the USPTO from another country.

But there’s a requirement that trips up a lot of international applicants.


You Need a US-Licensed Attorney

Since August 2019, the USPTO has required all applicants domiciled outside the US to be represented by a US-licensed attorney. Not optional. You cannot file or maintain a trademark application on your own if you live abroad.

The rule exists because the USPTO saw a wave of fraudulent and inaccurate filings from foreign applicants, many submitted by unauthorized agents who didn’t understand US trademark law. The attorney requirement cleaned that up.

Doesn’t matter if you’re a sole proprietor or a corporation. If the business is based outside the US, you need US counsel.


How It Works for International Clients

At Indie Law, we work with clients around the world. The process is largely the same as for US-based clients, with a few extra considerations.

The USPTO requires your actual domicile address on the application. Not a PO box, not a registered agent. Your real address, whether that’s in Canada, the UK, Australia, or anywhere else.

International applicants also have additional filing options. If you already hold a trademark registration in your home country, you may be able to file in the US based on that foreign registration under Section 44(e). Or if you have a pending foreign application, Section 44(d) may apply. Both can streamline the process.

If you’re filing on a use-in-commerce basis, you need to show the mark is being used in connection with goods or services in the US. Selling to American customers through an e-commerce site counts. You don’t need a physical location here.


What About Protection in Multiple Countries?

A US trademark registration only protects you in the United States. If you’re doing business in multiple countries, you need protection in each one.

The Madrid Protocol lets you file a single international application through WIPO that designates multiple countries, including the US. It can be more cost-effective than filing separately in each country, though it has its own complexities.

The other option is filing directly in each country. Every country has its own trademark office, its own rules, its own fees.


Mistakes International Applicants Keep Making

Filing without a US attorney. We see this constantly. Someone files on their own, the application gets flagged, and now they need counsel to clean up the mess. Costs more than doing it right the first time.

Assuming a foreign trademark covers the US. It doesn’t. Trademark rights are territorial. A registration in the UK, Canada, or the EU gives you zero protection in the American market.

Using an online filing service instead of an actual attorney. Filing services aren’t law firms. They can submit paperwork. They can’t give legal advice, respond to office actions, or represent you in a dispute.

Living outside the US doesn’t stop you from getting a US trademark. You just need the right legal team handling the filing. The process is straightforward when it’s done properly from the start.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

Are Government Filing Fees Included in Indie Law’s Packages?

Fair question. Trademark pricing can be confusing, especially when some firms bundle everything together and others list fees separately without explaining what goes where.


Two Separate Costs

Every trademark application involves two distinct expenses.

There’s what you pay Indie Law for our work: the search, application prep, filing, and communication with the USPTO on your behalf. That’s our attorney fee.

Then there’s what the USPTO charges to process your application. That money goes to the federal government, not to us. That’s the government filing fee.

Two different line items. Two different purposes.


Indie Law’s flat-fee packages cover our attorney services. Government filing fees are separate and paid directly to the USPTO when we file.

We’re upfront about this because we don’t believe in hidden costs. When you work with us, you know exactly what our fees are and exactly what the USPTO fees are before anything gets filed.

As of 2025, the standard USPTO filing fee under multiple classes means $350 per class, per application.


Why We Don’t Bundle

Some trademark services, especially the low-cost online filing companies, advertise a single price and bury the government fee in the fine print. You think you’re paying $199 for a trademark, and then the total at checkout is $549.

Other firms wrap everything into one number, which sounds cleaner but often means you’re paying a premium for not seeing the breakdown.

We think you should know what you’re paying for. The government fee is the same regardless of which attorney you hire. Our job is to make sure your application is done right so that fee isn’t wasted.


Other Government Fees That Might Come Up

The initial filing fee isn’t the only one. Depending on how your application progresses, a few others may apply.

If you filed on an intent-to-use basis, there’s a fee when you submit your Statement of Use proving you’re using the mark in commerce. If you need more time before submitting that proof, each six-month extension has a fee.

After registration, you’ll have maintenance filings due between years 5 and 6, then every 10 years. Each of those has a government fee too.

We walk clients through all of this before they commit. No surprises.

If you’ve been burned by vague pricing or checkout-page surprises from other services, that’s exactly why we do things differently. You’ll always know the full cost before we file anything.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

Can I Enforce My Trademark Rights While My Application Is Pending?

You filed your application. The USPTO is processing it. And then you spot another business using a name that looks uncomfortably close to yours.

First instinct: do something about it. But can you? Is a pending application enough?

Honest answer: it’s complicated. But you’re not powerless.


A Pending Application Isn’t a Registration

This is the critical distinction. A pending application does not give you the same rights as a federal registration. You can’t cite it in a federal infringement lawsuit the way you could cite a registered mark.

Registration gives you a legal presumption of ownership and the exclusive right to use the mark nationwide for your listed goods and services. A pending application doesn’t carry those presumptions. It’s a claim in progress.

That said, pending is not nothing.


Common Law Rights Still Exist

Even without registration, you have trademark rights based on your actual use of the mark in commerce. These are common law rights, and they exist the moment you start using a distinctive mark to identify your business.

They’re limited geographically. They typically only reach the areas where you’re doing business. But they’re real and they’re enforceable.

If someone in your market is using a confusingly similar mark and it’s causing actual confusion among customers, you may have grounds for a common law claim regardless of where your federal application stands.


What You Can Do Right Now

You don’t need a federal registration to send a cease and desist letter. If you have common law rights and you believe someone is infringing, a well-crafted letter from an attorney can be effective. A lot of disputes get resolved at this stage without ever seeing a courtroom.

You should also be documenting everything. Screenshots, dates, evidence of customer confusion. This record becomes critical if things escalate.

And watch the USPTO database. If the other party files their own application, you may be able to oppose it during the publication period. Your pending application and your earlier use in commerce can both support that opposition.


Your Filing Date Is Working for You

Even without full enforcement power, your pending application does something important. It locks in your priority date.

If you filed before the other party started using their mark, that earlier date gives you an advantage in any future dispute. In trademark law, being first matters. A lot.

This is one of the biggest reasons not to delay filing. Every day you wait is a day someone else could file first or start using a similar name.


Once Registration Comes Through

When your application is approved and the mark is registered, everything changes. You can file infringement lawsuits in federal court. You can use the registration as evidence of your exclusive right to the mark nationwide. You can seek statutory damages and attorney’s fees in cases of willful infringement. You can even record the trademark with US Customs to block infringing goods at the border.

Registration turns a regional common law claim into a nationwide, federally backed right. That’s a meaningful upgrade.

A pending application limits your options, but it doesn’t leave you defenseless. You still have common law rights. You can still send cease and desist letters. You can still oppose conflicting applications. And your filing date is quietly building your case in the background. But the sooner that registration comes through, the stronger your position gets. If you need to act now and your application is still pending, talk to a trademark attorney about the best approach for your specific situation.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

Our Latest Blog

Your brand is your most important asset. Dive into Indie Law’s resources to guide you through the maze of trademark law and keep your brand safe from copycats and infringers!

Follow Us

Trademark Blog Categories

Did you know?

Without Trademarks, You Have ZERO Rights To Your Brand.

We’re talking business names, logos, slogans… even podcast titles. Lots of entrepreneurs don’t protect their trademarks until it’s too late.

So we made a short, free video to help you avoid the biggest, most dangerous mistakes that business owners make.

Wanna see it?