Blog

Our Latest Blogs

Your brand is your most important asset. Dive into Indie Law’s resources to guide you through the maze of trademark law and keep your brand safe from copycats and infringers!

What to Expect on Your Trademark Consultation Call (and How to Prepare)

If you’re wondering what happens on a trademark consultation call and how to get ready—you’re not alone. One of the biggest pain points we hear from potential clients is uncertainty about the process. At Indie Law, we believe in removing the mystery, empowering you with knowledge, and helping you show up confident and prepared.

This post will walk you through exactly what happens during a consultation, what to have ready, and how to make the most of this important first step.

Why a Trademark Consultation Matters

A trademark isn’t just a legal box to check—it’s your brand’s legal armor. Whether you’re protecting your logo, business name, or slogan, a consultation is the first step in claiming your space in the marketplace.

According to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), over 72% of trademark applications are initially refused, often due to simple mistakes like conflicts with existing trademarks or vague descriptions of goods/services. A consultation helps you avoid these common errors and get on the path to protection.

What Happens During a Trademark Consultation Call

Here’s what you can expect on your call with the Indie Law team:

1. Introduction and Discovery

We’ll start by learning about your business, your brand, and what you’re trying to protect. This is your chance to tell your story—how you started, what your mission is, and how your brand is showing up in the world.

2. Preliminary Risk Assessment

We’ll talk through whether your name or logo is likely to run into issues. Our team may do a light screening search or discuss results if you’ve already done one. Note: This is not a full legal search, but it offers early insights on potential risk.

3. The Trademark Process Explained

You’ll learn the step-by-step process—from comprehensive search to filing—and what timelines to expect. On average, USPTO review takes 8–12 months, though every case varies.

4. Customized Legal Strategy

We’ll outline your options based on your specific goals. For example, if you plan to expand internationally or launch digital products, that impacts the type of trademark protection you need.

5. Q&A and Next Steps

This is your chance to ask anything. Wondering about classes, costs, conflicts, or how enforcement works? We’re here to clarify your concerns and discuss the best path forward.

⚠️ Please note: This call is an informational session. Legal services officially begin only after you hire us as your attorney.

How to Prepare for Your Call

To get the most value from your consultation, come with a few things ready:

✅ Brand Assets

  • Your business name, logo, slogan, or product names
  • Variations or alternate spellings you’re using

✅ Description of What You Do

  • What products or services do you offer?
  • Who is your target audience?
  • Where do you operate (online, local, or global)?

✅ Evidence of Current Use (If Applicable)

  • Website URL or social profiles
  • Product listings, packaging photos, or marketing materials

✅ Long-Term Goals

  • Planning to expand?
  • Launching a podcast or new brand content?
  • Going international?

✅ Questions to Ask

  • “How do I know if my name is unique enough to register?”
  • “What does the timeline look like?”
    “What happens after I file?”
  • “How are disputes or oppositions handled?”

Bonus: Quick Stats to Know

Why Indie Law?

At Indie Law, we work with creative entrepreneurs, coaches, course creators, and online brands—so we get the nuances of your work. Our mission is to demystify the legal process, provide actionable strategies, and make you feel fully supported from day one. This isn’t just a formality—it’s the first step in your protection plan.

Additional Resources from Indie Law

Looking to dive deeper? Here are some helpful reads that complement this guide:

LegalZoom vs. Trademarkia vs. Trademark Engine: Are Budget Trademark Services Worth It?

Thinking about using a budget-friendly service like LegalZoom, Trademarkia, or Trademark Engine to file your trademark? These platforms promise fast results and low prices—a tempting offer when you’re focused on building your brand. However, what looks like a deal today can cost you thousands (and possibly your trademark) down the road, making the strategic guidance of experienced trademark lawyers essential.

At Indie Law, we’ve filed over 1,000 trademarks and fixed countless issues for clients who first tried these do-it-yourself (DIY) platforms. Here’s what most entrepreneurs don’t realize until it’s too late.

These Platforms Look Easy—But Leave You on Your Own

LegalZoom, Trademarkia, and Trademark Engine share some important similarities:

  • They are not law firms.
  • They rely on automated forms, not legal analysis.
  • They’re not responsible if your application gets denied.
  • They expect you to know the law—even if you don’t.

In short? If you don’t know exactly what you’re doing, these platforms will file whatever you give them—even if it’s wrong. In other words—garbage in, garbage out.

It’s a Lot Like Going to a Car Shop When You Don’t Know Cars

Imagine walking into a car shop for a simple oil change. You don’t know much about cars, so when the person behind the counter starts rattling off a list of “urgent” add-ons—transmission flush, new filters, tire rotation, fuel system cleaner—you nod along. It all sounds important, so you say yes. Later, you find out most of it wasn’t necessary—and your car still isn’t running right.

That’s what using DIY trademark platforms feels like.

They’re counting on the fact that you don’t know what you need. So they upsell you on services that sound helpful—things like “comprehensive” reports, template libraries, or expedited filings—but those don’t matter if your trademark isn’t legally strong or eligible to begin with.

  • LegalZoom might send you a long, confusing report with no clear guidance.
  • Trademarkia might offer templates and monitoring tools—but skip the foundational legal advice.
  • Trademark Engine might promote a faster filing speed—but give you no help deciding what to file in the first place.

Without someone guiding you through the legal nuances, it’s easy to overpay, miss critical steps, and end up with a rejected application.

Trademark Engine: Cheap Filing, No Legal Guidance

Starting Price: $99

What You Get:

  • A basic “direct hit” search you could do for free on the USPTO website
  • A form-based application that gets auto-filled with your answers
  • Optional add-ons—but no legal insight unless you pay extra

🛑 Bottom line: You’re paying for automation, not strategy. No one’s checking your answers for risk or advising you on whether your mark is even protectable.

LegalZoom: You Get What You Pay For (Unless You Pay More)

Starting Price: $249+

LegalZoom is the most well-known DIY platform—and to their credit, they’ve added more options over time. But still, there are caveats.

  • Their basic package includes a search report but no interpretation.
  • Attorney guidance is only available in premium plans.
  • If you need help responding to a rejection, that’s extra.

⚠️ It’s easy to assume you’re getting legal advice when you’re not. And many users are left confused, overwhelmed, or with rejected applications.

Trademarkia: Looks Like a Law Firm, Acts Like a Software Platform

Trademarkia presents itself like a legal service—but in reality, it functions more like a software tool with legal add-ons. While it’s affiliated with a law firm, that doesn’t mean you’re getting meaningful attorney involvement.

In fact, many users never speak with an attorney directly. “Attorney review” may amount to a quick, surface-level check—or worse, be delegated to staff or paralegals. There’s no guarantee that you’ll get the depth of legal strategy your brand deserves.

On top of that, the platform heavily pushes upsells:

These extras may sound helpful, but they’re worthless if your application isn’t properly filed or gets rejected—which happens more often than people think.

⚠️ Many users walk away believing they hired a law firm—only to discover they paid for a glorified filing tool with legal branding.

Why This Matters

The USPTO reports that about 57% of trademark applications receive refusals, often because of mistakes that could have been avoided with real legal guidance. These include:

  • Choosing the wrong class of goods/services
  • Submitting weak or unusable specimens
  • Applying for something that isn’t even eligible for trademark protection

Without legal help, you might not realize you’ve made one of these mistakes until it’s too late—and then you’ll be stuck refiling (and repaying).

What Makes Indie Law Different

At Indie Law, we do more than file paperwork. We offer real legal strategy, clear communication, and no surprise fees.

✅ Attorney-led trademark search
We look for conflicts and analyze legal risks—not just names that match.

✅ Plain-English search report
We explain what we find in a way that actually makes sense. No legal jargon. No data dumps.

✅ Strategic guidance before you file
We help you make smart decisions, from choosing the right trademark class to strengthening your application.

✅ Office Action support included
If your application gets challenged, we handle it—without extra charges.

✅ Refile guarantee
If your trademark is refused and can’t be fixed, we’ll refile for free.

✅ Flat-fee pricing with zero upsells
Everything’s included. No surprise add-ons. No pressure to upgrade.

✅ Responsive, real-human support
You’ll always be able to reach us with questions—and it won’t cost extra.

 

 

Final Thoughts: Don’t Risk Your Brand

Choosing a trademark service isn’t just about saving money—it’s about protecting your brand. Don’t fall for flashy marketing or “too good to be true” pricing. These DIY platforms count on you not knowing what to ask for. And that’s where mistakes (and money pits) happen.

At Indie Law, we don’t just file—we protect. And we treat your brand like it’s our own.

👉 Book your free trademark strategy call today and take the first step toward securing your brand the right way.

Think Your Business Name Is Safe? The Truth About Trademark Conflicts

When starting a business, choosing a unique and memorable name is a critical step. Many entrepreneurs believe their selected brand name is distinctive, only to later face legal challenges due to trademark conflicts. Conducting a thorough trademark search before investing in a brand name is essential to avoid costly disputes and potential rebranding.

 

Understanding Trademarks and Their Importance

A trademark is a symbol, word, or phrase legally registered or established by use as representing a company or product. It grants the owner exclusive rights to use the mark within specific categories of goods or services and in the region where it’s registered. Trademarks are vital assets, contributing to brand recognition and consumer trust.

The Risks of Skipping a Trademark Search

Neglecting a comprehensive trademark search can lead to several complications:

  • Legal Disputes: Using a name similar to an existing trademark can result in infringement claims, leading to expensive legal battles and potential damages.
  • Forced Rebranding: If a conflict arises, you may be compelled to change your brand name, incurring costs for new marketing materials, packaging, and domain names.
  • Loss of Brand Equity: Building a brand takes time and resources. A forced name change can confuse customers and erode the trust and recognition you’ve established.

Real-World Examples of Trademark Conflicts

Several companies have faced significant challenges due to inadequate trademark searches:

  • Buc-ee’s vs. Barc-ee’s: Buc-ee’s, a Texas-based gas station chain, sued a Missouri coffee shop for trademark infringement over similar branding.
    (My San Antonio)
  • Katy Perry vs. Katie Taylor: Pop star Katy Perry won a legal battle against Australian fashion designer Katie Taylor, who operates under the brand “Katie Perry.” The dispute centered around the use of the name “Katie Perry” in relation to clothing sales in Australia.
  • WWF vs. WWF: The World Wildlife Fund and World Wrestling Federation (now WWE) battled over their shared acronym. This long-running dispute ended in a rebrand.

Steps to Conduct a Comprehensive Trademark Search

  1. Use Official Trademark Databases: Start with the USPTO’s Trademark Search Tool for U.S.-registered trademarks.
  2. Check Global Registrations: Use WIPO Global Brand Database if you plan to operate internationally.
  3. Hire a Trademark Professional: A legal expert can evaluate not just direct matches but also likelihood of confusion” — a legal test used by courts.
  4. Look for Common Law Conflicts: In the U.S., businesses can have rights to a name without registration. These common law” rights are typically limited to a specific geographic area and harder to enforce, but they can still block you or result in disputes.

The Hidden Costs of Rebranding

Rebranding isn’t just a creative headache ‚Äî it a financial one too. The cost of a full rebrand (logo, packaging, domain, SEO, legal filings, and customer communication) can range from $10,000 to $50,000 or more, depending on the company size and market. That money most startups can’t afford to burn.

Conclusion

Think your startup name is safe? Think again. Just because a domain is available or no one else in your network is using the name doesn’t mean it legally yours. A trademark conflict could derail your launch, force a rebrand, or even land you in court‚Äîall while you’re trying to scale.

 

Can You Trademark a Descriptive Business Name?

Understanding the Principal vs. Supplemental Register—and Why Generic Names Just Don’t Work

When launching a brand, one of the first questions many business owners ask is: Can I trademark my business name—even if it’s kind of descriptive? The answer depends on how unique your name is and whether it falls into the descriptive or generic category.

In this guide, we’ll break down the difference between descriptive and generic trademarks, explain how the Principal and Supplemental Registers work, and help you understand what kind of name gives you the strongest legal protection.

What Is a Descriptive Trademark?

A descriptive trademark tells people what your product or service is, what it does, or one of its key features. For example, “Cold and Creamy” for an ice cream brand describes exactly what the product is like.

Descriptive trademarks are not considered unique enough for full protection at first—but they can become eligible for stronger protection over time.

What Is a Generic Term?

A generic term is the common name for a product or service. For example, “Ice Cream” for a brand that sells ice cream is a generic term. It’s the word everyone uses to describe that type of product—so you can’t claim it as your own.

Legally, generic terms can never be protected as trademarks. You can’t register them with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), not even on the Supplemental Register.

Descriptive vs. Generic: What’s the Difference?

This legal distinction is critical. :

Descriptive marks may be registered (starting on the Supplemental Register), while generic terms never can be.

Why Descriptive Trademarks Go on the Supplemental Register

When you apply for a trademark, the USPTO will determine whether your name is distinctive enough for the Principal Register, or if it must go on the Supplemental Register.

Descriptive trademarks usually get placed on the Supplemental Register because they aren’t considered unique at first. However, they can gain distinctiveness over time—especially if you’ve used the name in commerce for several years and can prove that customers associate it specifically with your business.

Principal vs. Supplemental Register: What’s the Difference?

The Principal Register offers strong benefits like nationwide exclusivity and easier enforcement in court. Meanwhile, the Supplemental Register provides moderate protection—it helps you claim ownership and may deter others from using your brand, but you’ll need more evidence in legal disputes.

Can a Descriptive Trademark Move to the Principal Register?

Yes! If your descriptive trademark gains enough “acquired distinctiveness” over time—meaning that consumers now recognize it as tied specifically to your business—you can later reapply for the Principal Register.

A few ways to prove this include:

  • Long-term use in commerce (usually 5+ years)
  • Substantial advertising and promotion
  • Customer surveys or market recognition

This upgrade is common as your brand grows.

How to Avoid the Supplemental Register: Choose a More Distinctive Name

If you want stronger protection from day one, your best bet is to pick a more distinctive trademark. Here’s how different types of trademarks rank by strength:

  • Fanciful: Made-up words (e.g., Xerox, Kodak)
  • Arbitrary: Real words used in unrelated industries (e.g., Apple for computers)
  • Suggestive: Hints at qualities or traits (e.g., Netflix for internet movies)

Pro Tip: A suggestive trademark offers a great balance—it’s easier for customers to understand than a made-up word but still strong enough for Principal Register protection.

Is It Bad to Be on the Supplemental Register?

Not necessarily. It depends on your goals:

  • If you’re a small business just looking to claim rights and avoid rebranding, the Supplemental Register can give you peace of mind.
  • If you plan to enf

Case Study: Entirely Well – Securing a Trademark with Indie Law’s Strategic Support

Entirely Well LLC is a visionary parent company based in Huntsville, Alabama. With ambitions to grow across various consumer sectors—including feminine care, food, pet food, skincare, and eco-friendly cleaners—their brand strategy hinges on a strong, legally protected name.

The company sought to register its primary name, “Entirely Well,” and a potential brand extension, “Be Entirely Well,” as trademarks. However, navigating the complexities of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) process proved challenging. That’s when they turned to Indie Law, a firm specializing in trademark protection for entrepreneurs and growing brands.

The Challenge: Tricky Trademark Terrain

Trademarking a brand name is never one-size-fits-all. For Entirely Well, the journey involved navigating multiple legal hurdles:

  • Classification Confusion: Early filing attempts selected incorrect classes of goods/services, risking rejection or narrow protection.
  • Commercial Use Complications: Proving “use in commerce” for the “Be Entirely Well” slogan required tangible proof, such as product packaging and a compliant website.
  • Specimen Rejection: Initial specimen submissions—including websites and videos—were rejected for failing to meet USPTO criteria.
  • Deadline Pressures: Strict USPTO filing deadlines created urgency around re-submissions and extensions.
  • Trademark Differentiation: Each variation—“Entirely Well” and “Be Entirely Well”—needed distinct evidence of use.
  • Website Compliance: Their site needed adjustments to meet the legal display standards for trademarks.
  • Address Updates: A mid-application move meant updating contact info to avoid communication errors.
  • Similarity Concerns: Existing marks raised the risk of likelihood-of-confusion rejections.
  • Descriptiveness & Genericness: The USPTO flagged possible issues of descriptiveness, threatening registration.
  • Office Actions: Anticipating and preparing for potential USPTO objections was critical.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Long-term brand protection required future enforcement strategies.

The Solution: A Full-Service Legal Strategy

Indie Law stepped in with a tailored action plan that addressed every challenge with expert precision:

Trademark Class Clarity

We conducted a detailed trademark class analysis to correctly classify their products. This prevented misclassification and strengthened their legal position.

Use in Commerce Strategy

Our team worked with Entirely Well to craft packaging and web displays that clearly showed the mark being used in actual sales—satisfying USPTO requirements.

Compliant Specimens

Using high-resolution product images, branded labels, and e-commerce snapshots, we ensured specimen submissions were bulletproof.

Deadline Management

We implemented internal deadline tracking systems and set up direct communication channels for timely document submissions and responses.

Distinction Between Marks

Separate documentation and branding examples were prepared for “Entirely Well” and “Be Entirely Well,” emphasizing each mark’s unique role.

Website Modifications

Our legal team advised on web layout and content changes to showcase the trademark in a legally acceptable manner.

Address Accuracy

We filed timely updates with the USPTO to maintain accurate business contact records and avoid procedural delays.

Similarity Searches

Comprehensive trademark searches helped avoid conflicts with similar marks, reducing the risk of denial based on confusion.

Tackling Descriptiveness and Genericness

We used a combination of distinctive branding and evidence of acquired distinctiveness to overcome potential rejections.

Proactive Office Action Response

By preparing strong legal arguments and clear documentation, we addressed USPTO Office Actions swiftly and thoroughly.

Trademark Monitoring and Enforcement

We established a trademark monitoring program to keep watch for future infringement and maintain brand integrity.

Results: A Trademark Win for Entirely Well

The strategic partnership between Indie Law and Entirely Well led to multiple victories:

  •  Proper trademark classification ensured legal protection across all relevant product categories.
  • USPTO-accepted specimen submissions facilitated smooth progression to registration.
  •  Trademark registration for both “Entirely Well” and “Be Entirely Well” without rejection or delay.
  • Compliance with all deadlines and application requirements.
  • Successful updates to business information during the registration process.
  • No Office Action denials, thanks to thorough documentation and preparation.
  • Implementation of long-term trademark monitoring for continued brand security.

Client Testimonial

“Working with Indie Law was a game-changer for our brand. They provided expert guidance and made us feel secure about our brand’s future.” – Entirely Well LLC

Key Takeaways for Entrepreneurs

If you’re a founder building a brand in the wellness, food, or consumer products space, trademarking your business name and slogans is a crucial step in protecting your brand identity. Here’s what we learned:

  • Correct classification matters. Missteps can delay or invalidate protection.
  • Evidence of commercial use must be specific, visual, and verifiable.
  • A proactive trademark strategy, including monitoring, keeps your brand legally secure.
  • Partnering with an experienced trademark law firm like Indie Law can make the difference between approval and rejection.

Related Articles from Indie Law

Want to learn more about trademarks and how to protect your brand? Check out these helpful resources from our blog:

Case Study: All Spark Electric, Inc. – Trademarking a Local Electrical Brand with Indie Law

Founded in April 2022, All Spark Electric, Inc. is a Colorado-based residential electrical company offering a full range of services—from remodels and new construction to general electrical maintenance. Led by Laura Douglas, with support from Jeremy Douglas, the company serves clients throughout the state and is active on social media under the handle @comom2three.

To protect their growing brand and prevent future legal conflicts, All Spark Electric turned to Indie Law to trademark their business name, “All Spark Electric, Inc.”

Challenges

1. Lack of a Website for Proof of Use
Without a website, providing the USPTO with valid proof of commercial use was difficult. The team needed to identify alternative forms of evidence that would meet federal standards.

2. Trademark Discrepancy
The company originally intended to trademark “All Spark Electric,” but official branding consistently included “Inc.,” requiring a pivot in filing strategy to ensure consistency.

3. Search Results Concerns
Indie Law’s comprehensive trademark search revealed potential conflicts, necessitating a careful legal review and explanation to the client.

4. Need for a Second Trademark Search
Because the final filing would include “Inc.,” a second full search was required to confirm there were no conflicts with the revised trademark.

5. Maintaining Momentum Through Client Communication
To avoid application delays, Indie Law needed to ensure timely responses from the client and maintain clear communication throughout.

Solutions

✔ Alternative Proof of Use Strategy
Indie Law guided All Spark Electric in submitting alternative materials, such as photographs of business vans, yard signs, business cards, and invoices, all demonstrating trademark use in real-world settings.

✔ Aligning the Trademark With Actual Use
Through collaborative consultation, it was determined that filing for “All Spark Electric, Inc.” better aligned with the business’s actual branding and legal presence.

✔ Explaining Trademark Search Findings
Indie Law presented a clear, jargon-free summary of potential risks found in the trademark search and offered professional advice on why moving forward was still viable.

✔ Second Search for Accuracy and Legal Strength
A follow-up search ensured that “All Spark Electric, Inc.” was distinct and registrable, solidifying the trademark strategy.

✔ Consistent Client Follow-Up
To keep the process on track, Indie Law emphasized urgency in communications and followed up regularly to gather information quickly and avoid unnecessary delays.

Results

  • Accepted Proof of Use:
    Alternative evidence submitted to the USPTO was accepted, allowing the application to proceed without issue.
  • Trademark Aligned with Brand:
    Filing for “All Spark Electric, Inc.” matched existing branding, increasing both the strength and clarity of the trademark.
  • Fully Informed Client:
    The client understood potential risks and next steps thanks to transparent legal communication.
  • Accurate and Confident Application Filing:
    The second trademark search confirmed the brand’s uniqueness and supported a confident filing strategy.
  • Timely Progression:
    Indie Law’s proactive follow-ups kept the process moving and reduced the risk of missed deadlines or abandonment.

Key Takeaways

This case study shows how even without a website or initial clarity on branding, a business can still secure its trademark through strategic legal guidance. With Indie Law’s help, All Spark Electric:

  • Used creative proof-of-use alternatives to meet USPTO requirements
  • Strengthened their trademark by aligning it with their actual business name
  • Understood the risks of moving forward thanks to clear, transparent communication
  • Maintained steady application momentum with consistent legal support

Indie Law’s commitment to thoroughness, education, and on

Did you know?

Without Trademarks, You Have ZERO Rights To Your Brand.

We’re talking business names, logos, slogans… even podcast titles. Lots of entrepreneurs don’t protect their trademarks until it’s too late.

So we made a short, free video to help you avoid the biggest, most dangerous mistakes that business owners make.

Wanna see it?