Our Latest Blogs

Your brand is your most important asset. Dive into Indie Law’s resources to guide you through the maze of trademark law and keep your brand safe from copycats and infringers!

Having an LLC Does Not Protect Your Brand Name. A Trademark Attorney Explains What Actually Does.

Most entrepreneurs assume their business registration covers their brand. It does not, and the mistake can be costly.

CHICAGO, IL — Every year, thousands of entrepreneurs launch businesses, register an LLC, grab a domain name, and claim their social media handles. Then they assume their brand is protected. According to trademark attorney Joey Vitale of Indie Law, that assumption is one of the most common and costly mistakes a business owner can make.

“I talk to business owners every week who are shocked to learn that their LLC does nothing to protect their brand name,” said Vitale. “State business registration and federal trademark protection are completely separate systems. One gets you a tax ID. The other gives you legal ownership of your brand.”

What an LLC Actually Does

Registering an LLC establishes your business as a legal entity with your state. It protects your personal assets from business liability and allows you to operate under a business name within that state’s registration system. It does not give you exclusive rights to use that name across the country. It does not prevent another business from trademarking that same name.

What a Federal Trademark Actually Does

A federal trademark registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office gives you nationwide exclusive rights to use your brand name, logo, or slogan in connection with your specific goods or services. It creates a legal presumption that you own the mark. It allows you to use the registered trademark symbol. And it gives you the legal standing to stop others from using a confusingly similar name.

“Without a federal trademark, you could spend years building a brand and then receive a cease and desist letter from someone who registered your name before you did,” Vitale explained. “At that point, your options are limited and expensive.”

The Risk of Waiting

Over 500,000 trademark applications are filed with the USPTO every year. That number grows annually. Every day a business operates without trademark protection is another day someone else could file for that same name and win.

Vitale works with entrepreneurs, creatives, and growing businesses across the country through Indie Law, a firm that focuses exclusively on trademark law. His team has filed over 1,500 trademarks with a 99.7% success rate.

“Trademark protection is more accessible than most people think,” said Vitale. “The process takes time, but getting started is straightforward. The peace of mind is worth every penny.”

What Business Owners Should Do Next

The first step is a comprehensive trademark search to find out whether your brand name is available to register. From there, an experienced trademark attorney can walk you through the filing process and handle everything on your behalf.

Business owners who want to find out whether their brand is legally protected can schedule a consultation with the Indie Law team at https://www.indielaw.com/call-ty/


About Indie Law

Indie Law is a trademark law firm serving entrepreneurs, creatives, and growing businesses across the United States. Founded by trademark attorney Joey Vitale, Indie Law focuses exclusively on trademark law, helping clients protect their brands through federal trademark registration, comprehensive searches, and ongoing brand monitoring. With over 2,000 trademarks filed and a 99.7% success rate, Indie Law is the trademark firm other law firms trust. Learn more at indielaw.com.

Joey Vitale — CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Joey Vitale

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney, Indie Law

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they've filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer.

Learn more →

Celebrities Are Trademarking Their Voices to Fight AI Deepfakes. Here’s What That Means for Your Brand

Artificial intelligence can clone your voice in seconds. Your face, your brand, your likeness. All of it. And the law isn’t fully prepared to stop it.

That’s the real issue behind recent headlines involving Taylor Swift and Jimmy Kimmel. Both celebrities filed trademark applications in late April 2026 to protect their voices and likenesses from AI-generated deepfakes. While this might sound like a celebrity problem, it’s actually a warning sign. One every small business owner needs to hear.

The celebrities making trademark history

Taylor Swift filed three trademark applications: two sound marks tied to her voice and one visual mark connected to her likeness. Just days later, Jimmy Kimmel filed three similar applications covering his voice and image. The strategy: use trademark protection as a legal tool to stop unauthorized AI-generated imitations.

It’s a creative approach. But let’s be honest. It’s also untested. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has historically required that sound marks be distinctive and consistently tied to a brand in a commercial way. A natural speaking voice doesn’t always clear that bar. These applications are pushing the boundaries of existing trademark law, and we won’t know how they land for a while.

Why this is happening now

AI voice cloning and deepfake technology have improved at a rapid pace. Deepfake-related fraud has increased by over 30% year over year, and this isn’t a fringe issue anymore. It’s affecting public figures, businesses, and consumers alike.

To understand why trademark law is being used here, it helps to look at what other legal protections can’t do.

Copyright protects original creative works, not a person’s voice or style. The right of publicity (a state-level law that protects your name, image, and likeness) can help, but it typically kicks in after the damage is already done. Trademark law, on the other hand, is designed to prevent consumer confusion and protect brand identity before harm occurs. That proactive protection is what makes it so attractive in the fight against deepfakes, even if applying it to voices is still uncharted territory.

Why your brand is just as vulnerable

Here’s where small business owners need to pay attention. You may not be a celebrity, but your brand works the same way. Your business name, logo, tagline and yes, even your voice in marketing content are the identifiers your customers recognize and trust.

And if AI can replicate that identity? It can dilute your brand and create real confusion in the marketplace.

Picture a competitor using AI to mimic your voice in a video ad, or replicate your branding in a way that misleads your customers. Without trademark protection, your ability to stop that is limited.

Federal trademark registration changes that. It gives you exclusive rights to your mark and a legal foundation to take action against infringement. We’ve helped over 1,500 businesses legally own their brands, and in a world where AI can copy what you’ve built overnight, that protection matters more than ever.

Not sure if your brand is protected? Let’s find out together. Book a free brand protection consultation.

What trademark protection can and can’t do

It’s worth being clear here. A trademark won’t stop every form of AI misuse, especially if the use isn’t tied to commerce or doesn’t create consumer confusion. But it significantly strengthens your position and gives you enforceable rights you wouldn’t otherwise have. Even if courts ultimately reject the idea of trademarking a human voice, the broader lesson is the same: strong brand protection is more important now than ever.

What you can do right now

File a federal trademark for your business name if you haven’t already. This is your primary brand asset and the foundation of your legal protection.

Protect your logo and tagline, especially if they’re distinctive and tied to your identity.

Monitor your brand online. Set up Google Alerts and watch for unauthorized use.

Be consistent with how you show up. If your business relies on podcasts, video, or social media, the more consistently you present your voice and identity, the stronger your brand recognition and your legal position.

The bigger picture

The law is evolving in response to technology. Celebrities like Taylor Swift and Jimmy Kimmel aren’t just protecting themselves. They’re testing legal theories that could shape how courts handle AI-generated identity for years to come. Whether or not their specific applications succeed, they’re signaling something important: voice, likeness, and personal identity are becoming core components of a brand.

For small business owners, the takeaway is clear. AI is making it easier than ever to copy what you’ve built. But it’s also making strong brand protection more valuable than ever.

If you haven’t taken steps to secure your trademarks, now is the time. Because in a world where your voice, image, and brand can be replicated instantly, the businesses that win will be the ones that own their identity and know how to protect it.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

 

Nike’s Bronny James Trademark Rejected: A “Likelihood of Confusion” Case Explained

Nike just had its trademark application rejected for Bronny James’ “B9” logo, and the reason is something most business owners completely misunderstand. The United States Patent and Trademark Office refused the application because of a “likelihood of confusion” with an existing trademark owned by Back9 Golf Apparel, a Texas based company. Both marks were filed for clothing and apparel, which made the issue much more serious. According to the USPTO, the logos are similar enough that consumers could believe the products come from the same source. That is all it takes to get denied. Not an exact copy. Not bad intent. Just the potential for confusion.

This is where most people get trademark law wrong. They assume that if they are not copying a brand exactly, they are safe. They think changing a font, adding a design element, or tweaking a name is enough. It is not. Trademark law looks at the overall commercial impression of a brand. If two marks feel similar in the real world, especially when used on the same type of product, there is a high chance of rejection.

Even Nike ran into this problem. That should tell you how common this issue really is.

Bronny James’ situation is getting attention because of his name and platform, but the legal principle applies to everyone. Whether you are launching a clothing brand, building a personal brand, or starting an ecommerce business, the same rules apply. You do not get extra protection because you are new, and you do not get a pass because you were unaware of an existing trademark.

What made this case more straightforward for the USPTO is the category. Both Nike’s “B9” logo and Back9’s registered mark are tied to clothing and apparel. That overlap matters more than most people realize. When trademarks are used in the same industry, the bar for what counts as “confusingly similar” gets much lower. A name or logo that might survive in two unrelated industries can easily get rejected when both are selling similar products.

There is also a timing issue that works against Nike. Back9 began using its “B9” mark in 2020 and secured federal registration in 2022. In trademark law, priority matters. The first to use and register a mark generally has stronger rights. Once that registration is in place, it becomes a major obstacle for anyone trying to register something similar later.

This is not a rare situation. According to USPTO data, “likelihood of confusion” is one of the most common reasons trademark applications are refused. Thousands of applications face this issue every year. Many of those applicants have already invested in branding, logos, packaging, and marketing before discovering there is a problem. By that point, fixing it becomes expensive.

Here is what “likelihood of confusion” really means in plain English. If a customer sees two brands and reasonably thinks they are connected, affiliated, or come from the same company, there is a problem. That confusion does not have to be proven with actual mistakes. The possibility alone is enough.

For example, if you launch a brand called “FitNine” selling athletic apparel, and there is already a “Fit9” brand in the same space, changing the spelling will not save you. If the sound, look, and meaning are close enough, the USPTO can still reject your application. The same logic applies to logos. Stylized letters, fonts, and design tweaks do not override similarity in the core mark.

Nike now has a few options. The company can respond to the refusal and argue that the marks are different enough. It can try to narrow the scope of the application or adjust the design. It could also attempt to reach an agreement with the existing trademark owner. In some cases, these strategies work. In others, they do not, and the brand has to pivot.

For most businesses, the bigger lesson is what should happen before filing. A proper trademark clearance search is critical. This goes beyond a quick Google search or checking if a domain name is available. It involves reviewing federal registrations, pending applications, and even unregistered common law uses that could create risk.

Skipping that step is where most problems begin. Businesses fall in love with a name or logo, invest in it, and only later realize it is too close to something that already exists. At that point, they are forced to choose between fighting a legal battle or starting over.

The Bronny James situation is a high profile example, but the takeaway is simple. If a company like Nike can run into a trademark refusal over similarity, anyone can. Trademark law is not about creativity alone. It is about distinctiveness and separation in the marketplace.

Before you build a brand, make sure you can actually own it. That means choosing something unique, clearing it properly, and thinking beyond design into legal risk. Because in the end, the question is not whether you like your brand. It is whether you can protect it.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

How to Protect Your Brand Before You Launch It

Most entrepreneurs do not lose their brand because of competition. They lose it because they did not protect it early enough.

It happens more often than people think. A founder picks a name, builds a logo, launches a website, and starts getting traction. Then a legal issue shows up. The name is already taken or too similar to an existing trademark. Now everything has to change.

Rebranding is not just frustrating. It is expensive. It can cost thousands of dollars in design, lost traffic, and momentum. In some cases, it can stop a business completely.

At the same time, the United States sees hundreds of thousands of trademark applications filed every year. That means the chances of name conflicts are only increasing. On the other side, more than 90 percent of startups fail, often because they struggle with positioning, visibility, or strategy.

So founders are dealing with two risks at once. They need to protect their brand legally, and they need to launch it in a way that actually generates revenue.

Most people handle these as separate problems. That is where things break down.

A typical path looks like this. You hire a trademark attorney to file paperwork. Then later, you try to figure out branding, messaging, and how to launch. There is no connection between the two steps. No clear system. Just a lot of guesswork.

The problem is that these decisions are not separate. They affect each other from the beginning. A brand name is not just a legal asset. It is also a marketing asset. If it is not viable on both sides, the entire business is at risk.

That is why Indie Law and 52Launch work together.

This is not just a partnership. It is a more complete way to build a brand. Instead of treating legal protection and launch strategy as two disconnected steps, this approach connects them from day one.

Indie Law focuses on protecting your brand the right way before you invest in it. That means confirming your name is actually available, filing your trademark correctly, and helping you avoid costly legal problems later. This step creates a solid foundation so you are not building on something that could collapse.

From there, 52Launch helps you turn that protected brand into something real in the market. That includes positioning, messaging, and a clear go to market strategy. Instead of guessing what might work, you move forward with a plan designed to attract attention and drive revenue.

Think about the difference in outcomes.

One founder skips the legal step or rushes through it. They invest in branding and launch quickly. A few months later, they run into a conflict and have to start over. Time is lost. Money is wasted. Momentum disappears.

Another founder takes a different path. They validate and protect their brand first. Then they build and launch with a clear strategy behind it. Every step supports the next. There is less risk and more direction.

The second path is not just safer. It is more efficient.

This is what makes the Indie Law and 52Launch approach different. It is not about filing a trademark or launching a brand in isolation. It is about creating a system that connects protection directly to growth.

Too many entrepreneurs treat trademarks like a simple task to check off a list. In reality, your trademark is the foundation of your brand. If that foundation is weak, everything built on top of it is at risk.

At the same time, a protected brand that never reaches the right audience does not create value. You need both sides working together.

If you are planning to launch a brand, the timing matters. The decisions you make early on will either protect your progress or create problems later.

The smarter move is to handle both from the start. Protect your brand before you invest heavily in it, and build a launch strategy that gives it a real chance to succeed.

If you want to avoid costly mistakes and move forward with clarity, this is where to begin.

Work with Indie Law to secure your trademark the right way. Then partner with 52Launch to bring your brand to market with a clear strategy.

Start here:https://52launch.com/trusted-chicago-trademark-attorney-52launch

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

Trademark Symbols: TM, SM, and ® (When You Can Use Each)

We get this question often. The answer is simpler than most people expect, but the consequences of getting it wrong are worse than most people realize.

Short version: you can start using TM right now. The ® symbol you have to earn.

SymbolWhat it claimsRegistration required?Who uses it
TMYou are claiming this as your trademarkNoAny brand, any time
SMSame claim, for a service instead of a productNoService businesses
®Your mark is federally registeredYes, USPTO registration certificateRegistered owners only

TM: no permission required

The TM symbol is not regulated by anyone. There is no form, application, or fee. It’s placed next to your brand name, logo, or slogan.

This communicates that you’re claiming this as your trademark. Think of it as planting a flag. It does not give you federal protection. It does not mean your mark is registered. But it tells competitors you consider this mark yours, and sometimes that alone is enough to keep someone from copying you.

SM: the service mark version

If what you sell is a service rather than a product, you can use SM instead of TM. For example, landscaping companies, consulting firms, and law practices could use SM, and it functions the same way that a TM symbol does.

Most service businesses just use TM anyway, and that’s fine as TM is widely understood to cover both. SM is a more precise signal if you want it, not a requirement.

Can I use TM without registering?

Yes. You don’t need a filed or pending application, or a lawyer’s permission. If you’re using a name, logo, or slogan in commerce and you consider it yours, you can put TM on it today.

What TM does not do is give you the enforcement power of a federal registration. Common law rights are limited to the geographic area where you actually operate, and proving them is slow and expensive. TM stakes the claim. Registration is what makes it easy to defend.

®: only after registration

The ® symbol means your trademark has been officially registered with the USPTO. Using it before that happens is not just premature, but potentially illegal.

Federal law prohibits using ® on marks that are not registered. If you use it on an unregistered mark and that comes up in a dispute, it can be used against you. Courts have denied damages to trademark owners who falsely used ®, treating it as a misrepresentation to the public.

Pending application? Still use TM.

A pending application does not give you the right to use ®. Your application could sit with the USPTO for 8 to 14 months, sometimes longer. During that entire window, you should be using TM. Only switch to ® after the USPTO issues your official registration certificate, not when you file, pass examination, or when your mark gets published in the Official Gazette. This can be used after registration only.

Once you are registered, use ®

Federal law says that if you do not give notice of your registration, you generally cannot recover the infringer’s profits or your damages unless you can prove they actually knew your mark was registered. The ® symbol is that notice. Leaving it off can quietly shrink what you are able to recover later.

The written alternatives are “Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office” or “Reg. U.S. Pat. and Tm. Off.” Most businesses use ® because it is shorter and cleaner.

Placement and formatting

Superscript, upper-right corner of the mark. You do not need to include it every single time the mark appears. First mention or most prominent placement is standard.

A few practical rules:

  • Use it on your website, social profiles, packaging, and marketing materials.
  • Attach it to the mark itself, not to a sentence about the mark.
  • Be consistent with usage.
  • In long body copy, once at first mention is enough.

Symbols outside the US

TM and ® are US conventions, and ® specifically means registered with the USPTO. A registration in another country does not entitle you to use ® on US-facing materials, and your US registration does not travel abroad either.

If you sell internationally, the safe default is TM everywhere and ® only in the countries where you actually hold a registration. Trademark rights are country by country. The symbol follows the registration, not the brand.

The mistake we keep seeing

Business owners add ® to their brand the moment they file, thinking the application itself gives them the right. It does not. And if someone challenges your mark later, premature ® usage can weaken your position or get your claims thrown out.

We’ve had clients come to us mid-dispute where the other side pointed to the premature ® as evidence of bad faith.

Use TM freely. Use ® only after registration. If you are unsure where your application stands, please discuss with a trademark attorney.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use the TM symbol without registering my trademark?

Yes. TM requires no application, fee, or approval. You can use it today on any name, logo, or slogan you are claiming as yours.

When can I start using the TM symbol after filing?

Immediately, and in fact before filing. Filing does not change what symbol you can use. You use TM from the moment you start using the mark, and you keep using TM the entire time your application is pending.

What is the difference between TM and ®?

TM is a claim. ® is proof. TM says you consider the mark yours. ® says the USPTO has registered it.

Is it illegal to use the ® symbol before registration?

It is prohibited under federal law, and courts have treated it as a misrepresentation to the public. In practice, the damage usually shows up in a dispute, where the other side uses it against you.

Do I have to use the trademark symbol every time?

No. First mention or most prominent placement is the standard convention. Consistency matters more than frequency.

What does SM mean on a trademark?

Service mark. It is the TM equivalent for a service rather than a product. No registration required.

Can I use ® if my trademark is registered in another country?

Not on US-facing materials. ® in the US means registered with the USPTO. Trademark rights and symbols are country by country.

What symbol do I use for a pending trademark?

TM. There is no special symbol for a pending application, and ® is not available to you until registration issues.

Do I have to use the ® symbol after I register?

It’s not required. Without notice of registration, you generally cannot recover an infringer’s profits or your damages unless you can prove they knew the mark was registered.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

What If I Decide to Not Apply After Seeing My Search Report?

What If I Decide to Not Apply After Seeing My Search Report?

It happens more often than you’d think. You order a trademark search, you’re excited about the name, and then the results come back showing someone else is already using something similar. Or worse, they’ve registered it.

Nobody wants that news. But it’s exactly the kind of news you need before you pour thousands into branding, packaging, and marketing around a name you might not be able to protect.


A Search Report Isn’t a Rejection

A trademark search is not a denial from the USPTO. It’s an analysis of what’s already out there: registered trademarks, pending applications, common law uses, sometimes domain names and business filings.

The purpose is to surface potential conflicts before you file. Risk assessment, not verdict.

Sometimes the conflicts are obvious and filing would be a waste. Other times the results are more nuanced. Maybe the existing mark is in a completely different industry. Maybe it’s been abandoned. Maybe the overlap is minor enough to argue around. That’s where having an attorney review the results matters, because the raw data doesn’t tell the whole story.


When Walking Away Is the Right Call

If the search turns up a registered mark that’s identical or very close to yours, in the same or a related industry, and it’s actively being used? Walking away is usually the smart move.

This is the search doing its job.

Think about the alternative. You file anyway, pay the government fees, wait 8 to 12 months, and then get an office action citing the exact conflict you could have caught early. Or you build a whole brand around the name, get traction, and then a cease and desist letter shows up.

A search costs a fraction of what a rebrand costs.


What Happens to the Money You Already Spent

At Indie Law, the search is a separate step from the application. If you decide not to move forward after reviewing your results, you haven’t burned your application fees, because you haven’t filed one.

You spent money on intelligence. That’s a good investment even when the intelligence tells you to pivot.


What to Do Next

If the search rules out your first choice, you’ve got options. Sometimes a small tweak to the name, adding a word, changing the phrasing, can create enough distance from the existing mark. Your attorney can tell you whether a modification is likely to clear.

If the conflict is too close, it may be time to go back to the drawing board. Frustrating, yes. But infinitely better than building on a name someone else owns.

And once you have a new direction, run another search before filing. Don’t skip it because you’re eager.

Deciding not to file isn’t a setback. It’s a smart business decision. You paid for clarity and you got it. The worst move is ignoring a problematic result and filing anyway, hoping it works out. Hope is not a trademark strategy.

Joey Vitale — Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law

About the Author

Joey Vitale, Esq.

CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law®

Joey Vitale is the CEO & Founding Trademark Attorney at Indie Law, a trademark law firm that helps you get peace of mind knowing you legally own your brand. He and his team are on a mission to be the best brand protectors they can be, and they’ve filed well over 2,500 trademarks. In addition to being an award-winning attorney, Joey is an internationally renowned speaker and the host of the chart-topping podcast, The Passive Income Lawyer. Learn more →

Did you know?

Without Trademarks, You Have ZERO Rights To Your Brand.

We’re talking business names, logos, slogans… even podcast titles. Lots of entrepreneurs don’t protect their trademarks until it’s too late.

So we made a short, free video to help you avoid the biggest, most dangerous mistakes that business owners make.

Wanna see it?